|
主题: 画了一个多月的画
|
 蓝鲸
职务:版主
等级:5
金币:42.1
发贴:2614
注册:2001/12/20 15:57:57
|
#162004/4/4 1:20:39
晚上来这真热闹,没想以有个新的论点了。两年也不太清楚他是怎么画的,不过人物画家何家英画的一张,用了一年时间。何家英可能是画家里画得较慢的,近二十年下来,就十来张工笔。他画的一张秋冥,用学生为模特,精心刻划了毛衣的纹理,连模特看后都感染非常深。 快画我想有快画的作用吧,画得好一样会有杰作的。快画可以锻炼人的能力和洞察力。我说不好,我画工笔可能以前在作设计时染上一种赶效率这种毛病吧,觉自己太躁,折中一下,最后就是对自己说,画画不要有太多观念。 其实这张画我已经不满意了,基础很要紧。
非常大鱼
|
 huwen025
职务:普通成员
等级:1
金币:0.0
发贴:9
注册:2004/4/4 0:13:24
|
#172004/4/4 1:49:33
好棒的工笔画
|
 zhalimuto
职务:普通成员
等级:1
金币:-3.0
发贴:300
注册:2003/11/4 7:25:45
|
#182004/4/4 2:54:01
zhuzhu!在上个帖子中说 引用: zhalimuto在上个帖子中说 引用: 赞扬这样的精神,说实话现在的speedpainting里快餐文化的味道太重了,如果画了几百张连一张精品也没有也并不是好事,sjun的speedpainting和这里最大的不同是那里大部分都创作作品,不像这里是纯粹临摹照片,创作还包含了构图,构思等重要因素,一小时的时间是画不出什么值得推敲的作品的,更何况还是临摹照片,希望大家都学学蓝鲸的精神。
画了几百张都没有精品?那你直接说是我好了,不用这么拐弯抹角的!你认为细腻的东西就是精品,那只是你个人的tasty。那和你的性格和爱好有直接的关系, 看你画图那样粘粘的,我看了都难受,不像个男人!当然这个是我的性格决定的个人品味和爱好。
sinjun在混的一帮人是什么水平,TMD都是职业的。我们能够坚持绘画已经不容易了,纵观国内的众多手绘论坛,这里的会员是最勤奋的!不管临摹也好,创作也好,只要画了就是好事,就有收获!
很多大师的创作也参考照片,参考照片并不是什么见不得人的事情。临摹和参考有本质的区别,只要你能够积累每一次的临摹经验,试着把更多的个人想法和见解加入其中,这个就是创作的雏形!不要以为那些创作天才的功力都是一蹴而就的,你只是看到别人成功的结果,并没有看到他们因此而付出的成顿的汗水和心血!
其实大家对于speedpainting还是有一定的误解,看似涂鸦和随意的东西是最难画的。磨一个月甚至一年的东西需要的只是耐心,仅此而已。因为再强烈的创作欲望,时间久了,还是会消磨光的。speedpainting是锻炼快速表达能力,在最短的时间内画出对象最本质的东西,而不是有些人认为的纯粹乱涂,快涂。如果能够在一个小时内解决的问题为什么要用一个月?【慢工出细活】并不适用于所有人。
至于什么是精品,并不是由绘画的累积时间说了算,花几年的时间一样可以画一张一文不值的垃圾,但是看似漫不经心的几分钟涂鸦,也许就是旷世巨作!这个主要看个人的素质,时间不能说明什么。
唯一需要大家引起注意的是精神,务实的精神,不管是长期作业还是短期速涂,不要管是临摹照片还是凭空创作,只要你在坚持画,不断地画,你会逐渐明白很多东西,很多东西会逐渐迎刃而解。画画是一种认识,一种意识。当你通过大量的练习,意识到了,认识到了,自然会明白绘画的真谛,美的真谛。
zhuzhu农不要这么敏感好不好,我又不是在说你,我是看到大家都在拿av女优的照片来 临摹,画的都没有灵魂,画画并不是单纯地表现卖弄技法的,每张画都有要表现的 思想的,看了这里许多高手临摹的女优画以后,我唯一的感受就是好,技法真精彩,然后呢,什么也没了。sjun里好多高手是在真正地创作,有一些会看了深有同感或是引起你思索的东西,我认为如果你能起一个命题而让大家去从不同的角度speedpainting的话一定能学到更多的东西。
|
 zhalimuto
职务:普通成员
等级:1
金币:-3.0
发贴:300
注册:2003/11/4 7:25:45
|
#192004/4/4 8:13:08
呵呵,刚才又去sijiun去了一次,已经有人因为这个功击你了,zhuzhu,看来我说的有道理啊,画的主题很重要,决定了画的品味,整天照着av女郎画,自然要给别人说成porn painter,希望这里的各位多多搞一些创作的东西,在画里注入自己的思想和灵魂。
|
 zhuzhu
职务:版主
等级:9
金币:91.3
发贴:22562
注册:2002/8/14 17:56:15
|
#202004/4/4 11:17:53
zhalimuto在上个帖子中说 引用: 呵呵,刚才又去sijiun去了一次,已经有人因为这个功击你了,zhuzhu,看来我说的有道理啊,画的主题很重要,决定了画的品味,整天照着av女郎画,自然要给别人说成porn painter,希望这里的各位多多搞一些创作的东西,在画里注入自己的思想和灵魂。
切,那些白痴我已经有力地回击了他们。不要以为他们是老外就可以对中国人指手画脚的。spooge也坦白,他很多图片都是参考照片画的,只是他参考得更加巧妙。至于那些喜欢随意评价别人的人本来就是半瓶醋的水平,对于创作一知半解,看看他们的图,我懒得和他们继续理论。从另一方面来说,他们是一种嫉妒心态,因为他们没有我这样的能力和技术水平,所以只能用作品有否内涵来攻击我。 至于super pin-up的主题,我只是想提供一个娱乐的空间,并不是我们手绘工厂的主流。至于该怎么创作,什么样的图才叫创作,个人有个人的见解。就拿你的那些图来说,也是半临摹的创作,不要告诉我那个凡高自画像你是凭空画的,就算是,也是一种默写。本来就不存在什么纯思维,纯创作的东西。一定有特别的事物打动了你,激发了你的创作灵感,绘画欲望。也许这种刺激是一个场景,一个电视画面,一张照片。关键是你如何利用这些刺激源创作出更加出色的东西。 我厌倦讨论是否画匠还是艺术家的问题,无稽之谈。画匠是艺术家成长的必经之路,如果没有深厚的基础和底蕴,那么艺术只能是建立在沙滩上的高楼。就好像现在雄心勃勃攻读MBA的各位“天骄”,都想去管理别人,拿高薪。不去掂量一下自己究竟有什么能力。虽然说“不想做将军的士兵不是好士兵”,但是凡事必须从最基本的开始做起,如果没有务实精神,那么不要去奢望什么成功。
|
 zhuzhu
职务:版主
等级:9
金币:91.3
发贴:22562
注册:2002/8/14 17:56:15
|
#212004/4/4 11:35:07
补充一句,我鄙视那些【好高骛远】的白痴!通常是半瓶醋的人才喜欢到处评点别人的不是,也不撒泡尿照一下自己是何方神圣!
sijun的那帮杂碎不是没有声音了吗?连spooge都说:what is good drawing? it's hard to say.
看看本大人是怎么反驳那帮杂碎的!
when classical music fans met hip-pop or rap,they would think that is junk.when pop music lover met classical music,they would boredom.it is taste. what is good tasty?what is bad tasty?
i love painting something what i think it is pretty.women,pets,landscape and so on.i think painting is direct,natural. i like the simple way, direct way to express.
what is pretty?what is natural? hard to define.maybe someone think shit is pretty,who knows.when people who like judge someone's work here,i should remind something.the speedpainting thread just like a big family,and i really like this place.but speedpainting thread is not a big menu,that you can ask and order something.
why not people ask spooge,hi man,too much matt paintings.could you show us some very detailing works?why not people ask Mr.Swarm,hey,too much female portrait,why something new? opps, i have forgot that guy hate painting a lot of things,or can't painting?
when someone told me: hey,zhu,stop the stupidity practice,It doesn't seem to have much meaning. why not show us something different? my answer is: i enjoy my way.i post here is not to show or pleased someone.
painting just like people,it is really depend on tasty or hobby.if i have bad tasty or bad hobby. it is my way.i don't want quarrel with someone. i just say my point.
——————————————————————————————————————————
翻译:
当古典音乐发烧友听到hip-pop或者rap的音乐,他们会认为那是垃圾。当流行音乐爱好者听到古典音乐,他们同样会感到厌倦。这是【品味】问题,什么是好的品味?什么是坏的品味?
我喜欢画我认为是美的东西,女性,宠物,风景等等。我认为绘画应该是直接的,自然的。我喜欢用简洁的,直接的方式去表现绘画。
什么是美?什么是自然?很难定义。也许某人认为【大便】也是美丽的,天知道。当某些人喜欢在这边对别人的作品指手划脚,我必须提醒他们。speedpainting的主题就好像一个大家庭,我非常喜欢这里。但是这个主题不是一个巨大的菜谱,你可以随心所欲地去点菜或者去要求什么。
为什么没有人去问spooge,hi,老兄,你画了太多的涂鸦,能不能画一些非常细致的图让我们开开眼?为什么没有人去问Swarm先生,嘿,太多的女性肖像,为什么不画一些其他的?哦,我忘了,那个家伙好像痛恨画很多类型的东西,还是没有能力画?
当某些人告诉我:嘿,zhu,快停止那些愚蠢的练习吧!那些东西看起来是毫无意义的,为什么不展示一些不同的东西呢?我的回答是:我享受我的方式,我在这里发贴贴图不是为了炫耀或者是取悦某某人的。
画如其人,这个完全视个人的品味和爱好所决定的。就算我拥有低俗的品味和不良的爱好。这是我的方式,我不想和任何人争吵,我只是阐述自己的观点。
——————————————————————————————————————————
这里还有一段spooge关于【matt painting】的观点:
I remember when I first started posting images that were ”less finished” people objected that I was throwing crap at them. I am not sure that there is anything inherently good about an abstracted image, but what I am after is simplification. One reason for this is laziness, what can I get away with? What can I leave out and still tell the story? One part of simplification that is often overlooked is when you leave stuff out, what remains by default becomes more important. The remaining aspects of a loose image most be precisely done, because so much is riding on it. So simplification is not just simplifiying, or rather it is more correctly finding out what is really important. By leaving out what is not needed, and playing up what is important, the image becomes stronger, has more impact, it hits the viewers mind with a little more force as they say “yes, that is what I see when I look at that.” And since each artists idea of what is important is a little different, the art becomes more personal and expressive. Duplicating photos is a fun parlor game for a while( I did my share), but what do you do after doing that for a while (years?) You start to pick and choose what and how you paint.
It’s funny that you think the halo image is over the edge, because it looks very realistic to me if you get back from it a bit. But you are right, I like the tension between the images life as a 2-d collection of textures and shapes and it’s suggestion of form. Probably that is my obsession.
I think the image was rejected because of the size and importance of the halo 2 project. The images for that campaign need to be very conservative. That is the unfortunate by product of success, you work on bigger projects and you don’t have as much freedom. It was just a sketch, I would have tricked it out as a finished product, but yes, I would get a big stiffy if they used it as is. Not ever gonna happen. But the need for speed images were done fast, no revisions. But they were for internal use, and that is a different world. I am trying to find a way to combine the approaches, to find a way of painting that most people would accept as “finished,” but the image still has some life and ambiguity to it. That is hard to do.
|
 zhuzhu
职务:版主
等级:9
金币:91.3
发贴:22562
注册:2002/8/14 17:56:15
|
#222004/4/4 11:36:15
关于ref和数字绘画的观点:
flush, I would not place much on those kind of rules. Learn them so you can break them. Draw that horizon right down the middle! Ever seen the academics that draw all kinds of circles and swirls and magic squares all over a master painting? Follow it closely sometime, you will see it makes no sense at all, or, you can do the same with a Kincade (not to pick on him, but he's a good example of a non-master) or a picture of road kill. The academic tends to make things very complex and impenetrable for the sake of their intellectual stature and future employment. Too bad, because it makes real insight a more difficult thing to see.
I think what is bothering you about that image is the break of value across the BG behind the gun barrel. Flattens things out when you have unfortunate alignments like that.
Mad martigan, If I use ref like I think you are meaning, it is pretty obvious, like the Clint eastwood thing. But I use ref all the time, but not to paint from, but more from informational purposes. I am working right now on some Cossacks riding through a forest. I have no idea what those uniforms look like. So I go get a lot of ref. But not to copy shapes or interpret shapes as an illustrator would. Hope that answers your question.
Capn Fred, digital is the perfect add and subtract medium. Use it that way! Paint it on, cut it back, move it around. Your shapes will get better and more interesting and loose that PS round brush worm look.
——————————————————————————————————————————
愤怒的马丁:如果我使用参考图就如你所说的那样,那是非常明显的,就好像那张【科林特.伊斯特伍德】那张图。我几乎都使用参考图,但是不是简单的描摹,更多的是获取一些有价值的信息。所以我做了大量的临摹参考,但不是去单纯地拷贝形状。
|
 oldpanda
职务:普通成员
等级:4
金币:22.0
发贴:674
注册:2004/1/16 16:01:58
|
#232004/4/4 11:50:15
神态感觉没有出来外,其它我觉得都很好啊  一个月画一张,最多的上了30多遍色。偑服
|
 zhalimuto
职务:普通成员
等级:1
金币:-3.0
发贴:300
注册:2003/11/4 7:25:45
|
#242004/4/4 12:33:09
我觉得个人有个人的道理,那个指责你的vy画功也十分惊人,我们应该少画些趣味低级的照片了,要画也要画些质量高雅些的照片,或者甚至是临摹大师的油画作品也能学到很多东西。那坛子说你也主要说你贴的都是学习技法的临摹照片的东西,他们看够了,他们想看看你的把那些技法实际运用到创作作品的东西来。你可以试着脱离照片默画创作一下。
|
 神笔
职务:普通成员
等级:1
金币:18.0
发贴:303
注册:2003/9/24 11:02:55
|
#252004/4/4 12:39:47
我享受我的方式,我在这里发贴贴图不是为了炫耀或者是取悦某某人的。 画如其人,这个完全视个人的品味和爱好所决定的。就算我拥有低俗的品味和不良的爱好。这是我的方式,我不想和任何人争吵,我只是阐述自己的观点。上面这些话好啊!!!同感。 画画本来就是一种嗜好,画自己的,别人爱怎么说都行,那些是评论家的事。
|
 zhuzhu
职务:版主
等级:9
金币:91.3
发贴:22562
注册:2002/8/14 17:56:15
|
#262004/4/4 12:41:19
什么是低级趣味?什么是高级品味?他们画的那些血腥暴力的,或者是机械战争的,那个就叫高雅了?
我说了,我贴图不是取悦某人,看够了就不要看!他们的烂图我也看够了,但是我尊重他们,至少我不会像他们一样冒充行家到处指手画脚,看见过spooge这么做过吗?这个就是一瓶醋和半瓶醋的区别!
|
 zhuzhu
职务:版主
等级:9
金币:91.3
发贴:22562
注册:2002/8/14 17:56:15
|
#272004/4/4 12:44:14
口口声声说创作的人,看看你的帖子里面有多少是你完全脱离照片凭自己想象画的?那张布上油画和拷贝照片有什么区别?无非是把几个不同的元素组合在一起罢了。还不如照片呢。
是不是要我把spooge那段关于【使用参考图】的原文翻译一下?你的英文比我好,应该可以看得更加明白。
|
 zhalimuto
职务:普通成员
等级:1
金币:-3.0
发贴:300
注册:2003/11/4 7:25:45
|
#282004/4/4 12:47:06
zhuzhu!在上个帖子中说 引用: 关于ref和数字绘画的观点:
flush, I would not place much on those kind of rules. Learn them so you can break them. Draw that horizon right down the middle! Ever seen the academics that draw all kinds of circles and swirls and magic squares all over a master painting? Follow it closely sometime, you will see it makes no sense at all, or, you can do the same with a Kincade (not to pick on him, but he's a good example of a non-master) or a picture of road kill. The academic tends to make things very complex and impenetrable for the sake of their intellectual stature and future employment. Too bad, because it makes real insight a more difficult thing to see.
I think what is bothering you about that image is the break of value across the BG behind the gun barrel. Flattens things out when you have unfortunate alignments like that.
Mad martigan, If I use ref like I think you are meaning, it is pretty obvious, like the Clint eastwood thing. But I use ref all the time, but not to paint from, but more from informational purposes. I am working right now on some Cossacks riding through a forest. I have no idea what those uniforms look like. So I go get a lot of ref. But not to copy shapes or interpret shapes as an illustrator would. Hope that answers your question.
Capn Fred, digital is the perfect add and subtract medium. Use it that way! Paint it on, cut it back, move it around. Your shapes will get better and more interesting and loose that PS round brush worm look.
你仔细读了他说得吗?他并不是在抄照片,只是在画一样物体时由于不了解物体的结构而去找照片作画的参考,而我们这里就不同了,构图,光影等等完全就在照抄reference照片,连照片人物的头被削去一截也愿封不动地照抄照画,这可就过了。 他从开始起稿和构图恐怕都是默想的,直到画到细节时采用到一些照片作参考。 I use ref all the time, but not to paint from, but more from informational purposes. 这句很关键,我们现在是 paint from reference
|
 zhuzhu
职务:版主
等级:9
金币:91.3
发贴:22562
注册:2002/8/14 17:56:15
|
#292004/4/4 13:00:50
临摹也需要一个层次和过程,你不能要求一个初学者去体会高层次的临摹。龙兄的那张图我也很惊讶,这个实在不是一个有几十年深厚功底的画者应该画出的东西。当然,我说了,人总有失策的时候,高手也会犯低级错误。为什么不用宽容的态度去看待这些?
我现在的图还是参考照片,但是我会更加强调我需要表达的东西。【临摹派对】里面的那些对照就是要告诉大家,要做照片的主人,不要去做它的奴隶。
spooge也是做了大量的临摹练习以后,才会有强悍的形象思维,因为那些形象元素早已烂熟于心。于是他说,只有用到具体细节的时候才会参考照片。这需要一个过程,不要被一些表面现象所迷惑。当我们赞叹王羲之的书法出神入化,谁会记得他曾经磨墨用完了门前的八大缸水?当我们赞叹达芬奇画的世纪的微笑,是否记得他曾经画过N次的鸡蛋?
|
 zhuzhu
职务:版主
等级:9
金币:91.3
发贴:22562
注册:2002/8/14 17:56:15
|
#302004/4/4 13:14:22
 我们也来刻薄地评判一下这个口口声声说【创作至上】的天才的图,在他贴图之后,别人已经把原图贴了上来。对比一下,这个【创作】是失败的,背景画得像【煮熟的大便】。前景的几辆自行车结构惨不忍睹。MM身上的黑色裙装和人体结构脱节,色彩浑浊。创作吗?那么多的低级错误,是一个曾经专业学过油画的人画出来的?还不如我这个只有正规学过2年水彩的业余爱好者。 创作是如此低劣的根基,根本不能令人信服,还不如一张经过认真思考后的临摹。
|